Oct 6th blog post: https://www.newconstructs.com/anthropic-is-the-most-ridiculo...

> We recommend investors avoid this IPO based on the company’s: warning, in its own prospectus, that is poses “a catastrophic or existential risk to humanity”,

Why would this matter for an investor?

In general? It wouldn't. But there already exist ETFs that include/exclude companies or entire sectors based on some ESG/SRI criteria. So, there are investors who care about such concerns.

>Do the creators and early investors in the company that might destroy mankind deserve to get rewarded for their efforts?

If AI destroy the world who would make them accountable? If not, then the risk is fictional and doesn't matter.