Show HN: Encarta 95 Web (benwinding.github.io)
Encarta is super nostalgic, and I was surprised it wasn't available to use online. So I embarked on the difficult task of making it so.
The way this works is the most convoluted, nonsense and brittle system ever... but it works as a statically hosted gh-pages site!
Please note: All the material on this site is freely available through the internet archive (see github readme)
Github repo -> https://github.com/benwinding/encarta_95_web
https://benwinding.github.io/encarta_95_web/#/article/Rock%2...
The output canvas has width="1024" height="768", but the CSS:
#screen_container canvas, #screen_container > div {
}overwrites it, making everything be upscaled...
It would look fine upscaled if only no one added the CSS rule "image-rendering: pixelated"
Actually, I didn't know that one could ship a pre-booted OS inside the emulator.
It's just a crappy render of a Windows VM's display, in all it's upscaled pixelated glory, it's not even doing anything webby like a Javascript engine that decodes whatever database Encarta used and rendered the data in crisp HTML.
If they had asked AI to do all the above, I'd be more impressed than this (I'm guessing) human-made slop...
(Mouse is VERY touchy though)
The hurt themselves badly by imposing a really annoying paywall just as Wikipedia was beginning to take off. A hybrid model with tiered access (maybe even a limited ad-supported free tier) might well have kept them on top - instead, they offered only a single expensive annual plan priced to compete with the paper or CD editions.
But I suppose that would pre-COVID too.
Still I'd quite have liked something like that.
Some have suggested a Wikipedia snapshot which can be browsed locally - not bad but not the same vibe as curated professionally written Encarta or Britannica.
It is not nearly enough to simply view an old revision from 21 years ago. It would be replete with broken templates, broken formatting, redlinks, and missing images, at the very least. And that applies to every single article, across the board, no matter what its content. The more comprehensive the article, the more broken it would look.
So what is it? I genuinely wonder. Maybe just the style of the visuals, a throwback to when a written piece of content online "mattered" more, as it represented something more, too.
It may not matter, but distinguishing what captivates and what naturally glosses seems like it may matter greatly in a space suffused by content.
- https://k.libl.in/encarta-web
- https://k.libl.in/ew